The branch main has been updated by siva:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9e2d8ec2df414a8019d9c31a9a09a5cc728b4c19

commit 9e2d8ec2df414a8019d9c31a9a09a5cc728b4c19
Author:     Siva Mahadevan <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: 2026-06-18 15:33:00 +0000
Commit:     Siva Mahadevan <[email protected]>
CommitDate: 2026-06-24 15:05:11 +0000

    tests/test_rtsock_l3: fix flaky temporal route addition tests
    
    If RTM_DELETE arrives before RTM_ADD, the test will skip the first
    reply and then timeout after attempting to read another message from
    the rtsock_fd.
    
    See the CI test failure[0] for more details.
    
    [0] 
https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-riscv64-test/16628/testReport/sys.net.routing/test_rtsock_l3/rtm_add_v6_temporal1_success/
    
    Reviewed by:    pouria
    Fixes:          e02d3fe70c7247027c85d60179c331618554ba34
    MFC after:      3 days
    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
---
 tests/sys/net/routing/test_rtsock_l3.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/sys/net/routing/test_rtsock_l3.c 
b/tests/sys/net/routing/test_rtsock_l3.c
index cdfc63d604bf..acd0828c4f38 100644
--- a/tests/sys/net/routing/test_rtsock_l3.c
+++ b/tests/sys/net/routing/test_rtsock_l3.c
@@ -973,6 +973,9 @@ ATF_TC_HEAD(rtm_add_v4_temporal1_success, tc)
 ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v4_temporal1_success, tc)
 {
        DECLARE_TEST_VARS;
+       char buffer2[2048];
+       struct rt_msghdr *rtm2 = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer2;
+       int seq;
 
        c = presetup_ipv4(tc);
 
@@ -984,6 +987,7 @@ ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v4_temporal1_success, tc)
 
        prepare_route_message(rtm, RTM_ADD, (struct sockaddr *)&net4,
            (struct sockaddr *)&mask4, (struct sockaddr *)&gw4);
+       seq = rtm->rtm_seq;
 
        /* Set expire time to now */
        struct timeval tv;
@@ -992,17 +996,24 @@ ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v4_temporal1_success, tc)
        rtm->rtm_inits |= RTV_EXPIRE;
 
        rtsock_send_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, rtm);
-       rtm = rtsock_read_rtm_reply(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer), 
rtm->rtm_seq);
+
+       rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
        ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm != NULL, "unable to get rtsock reply for RTM_ADD");
-       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_inits & RTV_EXPIRE, "RTV_EXPIRE 
not set");
+       if (rtm->rtm_type == RTM_DELETE) {
+               /* The messages arrived swapped, so swap them back when 
verifying. */
+               rtm = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer2;
+               rtm2 = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer;
+       }
+       rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer2, sizeof(buffer2));
 
-       /* The next should be route deletion */
-       rtm = rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
+       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_pid == getpid() && rtm->rtm_seq == 
seq,
+               "Unmatched rtsock reply for RTM_ADD");
+       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_inits & RTV_EXPIRE, "RTV_EXPIRE 
not set");
 
-       verify_route_message(rtm, RTM_DELETE, (struct sockaddr *)&net4,
+       verify_route_message(rtm2, RTM_DELETE, (struct sockaddr *)&net4,
            (struct sockaddr *)&mask4, (struct sockaddr *)&gw4);
 
-       verify_route_message_extra(rtm, c->ifindex,
+       verify_route_message_extra(rtm2, c->ifindex,
            RTF_DONE | RTF_GATEWAY | RTF_STATIC);
 }
 
@@ -1020,6 +1031,9 @@ ATF_TC_HEAD(rtm_add_v6_temporal1_success, tc)
 ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v6_temporal1_success, tc)
 {
        DECLARE_TEST_VARS;
+       char buffer2[2048];
+       struct rt_msghdr *rtm2 = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer2;
+       int seq;
 
        c = presetup_ipv6(tc);
 
@@ -1031,6 +1045,7 @@ ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v6_temporal1_success, tc)
 
        prepare_route_message(rtm, RTM_ADD, (struct sockaddr *)&net6,
            (struct sockaddr *)&mask6, (struct sockaddr *)&gw6);
+       seq = rtm->rtm_seq;
 
        /* Set expire time to now */
        struct timeval tv;
@@ -1039,17 +1054,24 @@ ATF_TC_BODY(rtm_add_v6_temporal1_success, tc)
        rtm->rtm_inits |= RTV_EXPIRE;
 
        rtsock_send_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, rtm);
-       rtm = rtsock_read_rtm_reply(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer), 
rtm->rtm_seq);
+
+       rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
        ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm != NULL, "unable to get rtsock reply for RTM_ADD");
-       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_inits & RTV_EXPIRE, "RTV_EXPIRE 
not set");
+       if (rtm->rtm_type == RTM_DELETE) {
+               /* The messages arrived swapped, so swap them back when 
verifying. */
+               rtm = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer2;
+               rtm2 = (struct rt_msghdr *)buffer;
+       }
+       rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer2, sizeof(buffer2));
 
-       /* The next should be route deletion */
-       rtm = rtsock_read_rtm(c->rtsock_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
+       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_pid == getpid() && rtm->rtm_seq == 
seq,
+               "Unmatched rtsock reply for RTM_ADD");
+       RTSOCK_ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(rtm, rtm->rtm_inits & RTV_EXPIRE, "RTV_EXPIRE 
not set");
 
-       verify_route_message(rtm, RTM_DELETE, (struct sockaddr *)&net6,
+       verify_route_message(rtm2, RTM_DELETE, (struct sockaddr *)&net6,
            (struct sockaddr *)&mask6, (struct sockaddr *)&gw6);
 
-       verify_route_message_extra(rtm, c->ifindex,
+       verify_route_message_extra(rtm2, c->ifindex,
            RTF_DONE | RTF_GATEWAY | RTF_STATIC);
 }
 

Reply via email to