Norbert Preining wrote: > >>It is very likely they did not change *just* the name, but updated the >>base font file as well, so simple name remapping probably will not work > > Yup, from marvodoc.tex: > > \item[2006-05-11] Version 2.1: Renamed Rightarrow macro to MVRightarrow. > New TeX name for font (umvs). Rewrote style file. Added fd file.
Better than I had expected. Assuming the package still uses the same pfb (and I think so, because of the timestamp on CTAN), then this should work: \definefontsynonym[fmvr8x][umvs] \loadmapline[+][umvs Marvosym <marvosym.pfb] But I cannot test that myself right now. >>It is bad luck that the last-minute update to marvosym in texlive >>breaks the marvosym support in context, but there is no way to fix >>that any more. > > Sorry for that, but in fact I didn't think about that ConTeXt us the old > marvosym interface? So it could have been broken since quite some time > if people upgraded the marvosym from CTAN. These things happen. It never crossed our mind to check CTAN ourselves, either. Best wishes, Taco _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
