2007/8/14, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, the problem currently is that some of us (not necessary me) > consider the licensing not a "non-free", but a "not-licensing" because > it violates the rights of urw++... anyway, time will show ...
Has anyone bothered to ask urw++? Best Martin _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
