Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> What we actually need, and that is the same for TeX Live and for all >> distributions (at least inmy imagination), is: >> >> - one (or several) system wide luatex cache thingies >> - one per user (if the user wants to) >> - a way to update the cache for specific trees only >> (luatools --system-only ...) >> - and the adaption of the lua functions that the different caches are >> merged at loading time, the later (user) taking precedence over the >> former. >> >> That would already be some big step forward. >> >>> come on, we do care, but it's a moving train ... >> ;-) Let me sometimes get rid of some frustration .... ;-))) It does not >> happen often anyway. > > I really wonder how (if at all) LuaTeX is going to work on MikTeX ... > :) ConTeXt is broken there already, and ConTeXt is the only tool that > really benefits from LuaTeX (apart from some of your tools on TL). The > new search capabilities are likely to break the MikTeX's auto-install > functionality as well if nobody will push Hans to fix it (or implement > it himself).
mixtex is another issue mostly because it uses a diferent approach; we had it working so at some point it will work again; probably not soon for luatex/mkiv but that's experimental anyway i simply have no capacity to run everything here (e.g. in order to set up a proper windows vm for testing i need additional windows licences which i don't have Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context