Hans Hagen wrote: > Oliver Buerschaper wrote: >>> While at it, I would like to place a vote for having as few >>> command names as is feasible. In the current situation I find >>> I often forget whether I need ctxtools or xmltools or textools >>> or ... > > not all scripts are for everyday use ... when using mkiv some can go > away (rlxtools may be intergrated in mkiv for instance) but combining > all in one also complicstes matters (conflicting flags for instance)
How about: $ mtxrun --script whatprovides tpm\* textools --tpmmake $ mtxrun --script whatprovides --all make luatools --make mtxrun --make mtxrun --script context --make mtxrun --script update --make texexec --make $ ;-) _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
