> (Arthur would probably argue about normalization at this point, but
> I'm also talking about combinations that don't exist in Unicode; maybe
> <eogonek><combining caron> etc.)
No, what you're proposing is independent of any processing of the
character stream, since it happens later, in the font. This is distinct
from normalisation.
(I think normalisation should be done anyway when you're processing
some text in any system, using the form that best fits the expectation,
but that is a separate issue.)
Arthur
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
