On 11/14/2012 11:29 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi Hans,

do you have any objections changing the following \kern into a
\hskip?

\startsetups[\??constructionrenderings:\v!hanging]
     % tricky: leftskipadaption is somewhat unpredictable
     \let\\=\crlf
     \noindent
     \advance\leftskip-\leftskipadaption\relax
     \ifdim\leftskipadaption=\zeropoint
         \leftskipadaption1.5\emwidth\relax % just some default
         \ifnum\c_strc_constructions_nested_state=\plusone
             \ifdim\leftskip>\zeropoint \relax
                 \leftskipadaption\leftskip
             \fi
         \fi
     \fi
     \ifnum\c_strc_constructions_nested_state>\zerocount % was
\ifnum\c_strc_constructions_nested_state=\plusone
\advance\leftskip\leftskipadaption % but we're already further on \fi
     \hskip-\leftskipadaption\relax
     \ifhbox\constructionheadbox\unhcopy\else\copy\fi\constructionheadbox
- \kern\ifdim\constructionsheaddistance=\zeropoint 
.75\emwidth\else\constructionsheaddistance\fi
+ \hskip\ifdim\constructionsheaddistance=\zeropoint 
.75\emwidth\else\constructionsheaddistance\fi
\useconstructionstyleandcolor\c!style\c!color \ignorespaces
\stopsetups

changing skips/kerns is always somewhat dangerous as one suddenly can get unwanted breaks ... is there a use case?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context

Reply via email to