Hans Hagen <mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>
15. Mai 2017 um 11:43
On 5/14/2017 8:55 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:20:43 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster
<schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
OTOH user-defined commands can be added to the ConTeXt lexer via the
Style Configurator (Notepad++) and get their own highlight color. I
have found this very useful in writing long documents. See attached
(User-defined Keywords dialog).
You can limit the number of custom commands when you use
\startnamedsection[topic][title=...]
instead of
\starttopic[title=...]
First time encountering these two commands; they're not on the wiki,
need to learn more about them..
in mkiv most commands that have generated names also provide generic
instance handling, like here
Can you explain or give a complete sample test file illustrating how
they apply in the matter under discussion? Thanks.
afaiks there is not much to add to the above example unless i
misunderstood; basically one can always use "topic" as instance name
to do something instead of \somecommandwith<topic>init
something like the following:
TeX primitives - Knuth
luaTeX primitives - excluding Knuth
macro structure - e.g., sectioning etc.
micro structure - e.g., itemizations, tables etc.
here i have document level (\startdocument etc) vs the rest
mode structure - e.g., metapost, xml, markdown
MkiV - remaining high level
MkIV - low-level [but how to separate them out?]
is there a need to separate them? after all, most users will not use
low level code and when they do it doesn't matter much to them if
they're more or less low level
low level is fuzzy anyway: \xmlfirst (more low level?) vs \xmlfilter
(more generic)
I can add class="system|primitive" (or level="...") to the XML files,
commands without attribute are user-level.
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
