Am 24.10.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Peter Rolf: > Am 24.10.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Hans Hagen: >> On 10/23/2017 11:14 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: >>> Am 23.10.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Hans Hagen: >>>> On 10/23/2017 7:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Pablo Rodriguez <oi...@gmx.es> wrote: >>>>>> Hans, >>>>>> >>>>>> according to Boris Doubrov (one of the developers of the veraPDF >>>>>> parser >>>>>> for PDF/A validation) the subtype of the /OutputIntent dictionary for >>>>>> all PDF/A intents should be GTS_PDFA1 (no GTS_PDFA2 or GTS_PDFA3). >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is his reply for reference: >>>>>> https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-parser/issues/317#issuecomment-338613962. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The attached patch fixes the issue. I have tried it myself and it >>>>>> solves >>>>>> the problems with color space profiles. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you apply it to ConTeXt? >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks for your help, >>>>> sure, but it's better if we have an example that fails >>>>> --- I mean, the source code, the version of the parser , the command >>>>> line used. >>>>> It could be that other parts are also not ok. >>>> i also want to check with Peter >>>> >>> >>> No objections, the 'gts_flag' is also fix for the PDF/X variants. >> >> So all variants get GTS_PDFA1 ? >> > > Yes. My guess (as I have no ISO documention) at that time was, that the > number should be increased with the versions. I couldn't imagine, why > the should use a number in that flag (there may be reasons for it, but I > donno them). > > Anyhow, I'll download veraPDF and test all variants with the actual > beta. I doubt that the results will differ. If I find any other errors > you can fix them at one go. Will report back (probably after lunch > break). I hope nobody is in a hurry :D > >
Tested all PDF/A versions with veraPDF 1.8.4 and ConTeXt 2017.10.24 10:30. No errors reported. > >>> I think I have tested all variants at that time (around Oct 2015) and >>> 'veraPDF' didn't throw an error. Looks like they have improved their >>> parser on that part. >> >> Well, for me it means that all that validation esp of keys like this are >> rather useless (creating work) because docs validated in the past and >> archived now are suddenly no longer valid. >> Well, the good news is that the actual problem does not effect any A1 documents. And even with an incomplete (99.9%) validity the documents stay usable. I'm sure that (alien) historians will love any ConTeXt created PDF/A document :D Anyhow, next time I'm in doubt about an entry I will ask the guys from veraPDF. They have a copy of the ISO docs. Peter >> Hans >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE >> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands >> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-context mailing list >> dev-context@ntg.nl >> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context > > _______________________________________________ > dev-context mailing list > dev-context@ntg.nl > https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context > _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
