A lot of production applications still regularly use 2.0. I haven't seen 1.1 around for a while.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Peter Dettman < peter.dett...@bouncycastle.org> wrote: > Hi Peter, > Yes, we're still maintaining it and looking to resume more active > development after a couple of quiet years. Really there's not much keeping > back 1.8. We're looking to improve the packaging (nuget) and to move to the > Portable Class Library as the primary release platform, but I think we'll > just release 1.8 as a roll-up of the improvements so far and look at those > things for a 2.0 release. > > However this may be a good time to ask the list: to what extent are users > relying on BC.NET running on .NET 1.1, or really on any version before 4? > > Regards, > Pete Dettman > > On 11/09/2013 4:55 PM, Peter Lindgren wrote: > >> Hi! >> I just joined, and when I look at the issues in Jira and Github, it >> appears like the project is somewhat maintained, and the only thing >> that hinders the 1.8 release is >> http://www.bouncycastle.org/**jira/browse/BMA-89<http://www.bouncycastle.org/jira/browse/BMA-89>, >> updating the README >> file, an issue from 2011. Is that correct? >> >> >> /Peter >> > > > -- *Jeremy Holovacs* *Sr. Systems Analyst* *GateHouse Media, Inc.* 350 WillowBrook Office Park, Fairport, NY 14450 *Phone:* 585-598-0066 *Email:* jholov...@gatehousemedia.com -- This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
