As I understand it, everything that's been deleted has been archived,  
and just because it's gone right now doesn't necessarily mean it's not  
going to be put back later.  It's part of a process.  We talked about  
it at length at the Summit, and I think the plan is a good one, it's  
just going to be inconvenient for some folks while it's ongoing.

Eric Shepherd
Developer Documentation Lead
Mozilla Corporation
Blog: http://www.bitstampede.com

On Aug 4, 2008, at 12:59 AM, L. David Baron wrote:

> I've been a little concerned (out of the corner of my eye) about the
> "reorganize www.mozilla.org" project for a while; I was worried
> something like this:
>  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446213
> would happen.  Now it has.
>
> While improvements in the organization of our documentation are a
> good thing, "let's delete everything since we can't deal with it"
> (or break links to everything, which is pretty much the same thing)
> is not an improvement.   When pages are moved, redirects should be
> added.  And changes being made on the presumption that content is
> obsolete should not occur without at least a good-faith effort to
> determine whether it is in fact obsolete.
>
> This change is extremely misguided and should be reverted.
>
> -David
>
> -- 
> L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
> Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
> _______________________________________________
> dev-documentation mailing list
> dev-documentation@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-documentation

_______________________________________________
dev-documentation mailing list
dev-documentation@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-documentation

Reply via email to