On May 21, 8:19 am, Benjamin Smedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Gough wrote: > > Is it supposed to be theoretically possible to embed XulRunner 1.8.1.3 > > at all? > > > I am trying (once again) to make this work, so I downloaded the SDK & > > runtime for xulrunner-1.8.1.3, and attempted to compile against it. > > The SDK only contains *frozen* interfaces and headers. It is currently not > possible to usefully embed gecko using only frozen interfaces: you will have > to use internal interfaces such as nsIBaseWindow as well. > > So if the question is "Is it possible to embed XULRunner 1.8.1.3 by > compiling against the SDK?" the answer is no. If the question is "Is it > possible to embed XULRunner 1.8.1.3?" the answer is yes. But you'll need to > obtain the nonfrozen headers/interfaces from the source tarball. > > --BDS
Is there any information about when this will be (or is planned to be) released? I'm in the same situation, I just realized I needed to define MOZILLA_INTERNAL_API . If possible, I'd like to use the frozen interface in the future. -m3 _______________________________________________ dev-embedding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding
