I don't know much about our stage environment. I don't know how involved deploying to stage is, or who does it. Without a better understanding, I probably couldn't offer the best option. Thanks for bring this up, however.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Karl Thiessen <[email protected]> wrote: > > After a conversation with ckarlof, I thought I'd ask if anyone has already > thought about this before I start to formulate a plan: > > I think we're agreed that having an oauth server and a 123done instance > that talk to the staging env would be a good idea. My question is, should > we deploy them as an extension of what jrgm is already doing on stage, or > perhaps use Danny's whizzy new stack-builder (which Vlad is happily hacking > to accommodate the two new servers)? There may be other alternatives I > haven't thought of, but those two seem to me to be the most likely > candidates. > > Do we have proposed names? oauth.stage.mozaws.net and > 123done.stage.mozaws.net seem reasonable to me. > > Is this all already in the planning stages, so I'm fretting for naught? > > Thanks for any context, > --KT. >
_______________________________________________ Dev-fxacct mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct
