Note that you def can have S3/SQ3/whatever access in the dev env. -Mark
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Sean McArthur <[email protected]> wrote: > +dev-fxacct I realized there may be more people who want in on this. > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Sean McArthur <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, so, the Profile service is going from a dumb proxy of emails to an >> image crunching and serving monster. Let's ready the monster cage! >> >> # Overview >> >> 1. FxA UI will POST some binary image data at an endpoint. >> 2. The webserver will generate a unique id, and pipe that payload >> straight into a private S3 bucket, with the name of the id. Once the upload >> to S3 is complete, the webserver will add the id to an SQS instance. >> 3. We will have an SQS instance. >> 4. A different worker server will pestering SQS for new images to crunch. >> 5. When it finds new messages in the queue, it will download them from >> the private S3 bucket, resize them if necessary, and reencode them to >> ensure they're plain images. >> 6. The worker will upload the crunched image to a public S3 bucket. >> 7. That image should now be reachable from >> https://firefoxusercontent.domain/a/id. >> >> # Details >> >> - S3 - I'm assuming we'll need 2 buckets, 1 private for dumping "unsafe" >> images, and a 2nd public that can server image files through a URL. >> >> - SQS - Will need 1 so that webheads can alert workers when there are new >> images to crunch. >> >> - Servers - 2 kinds of servers: the web server runs in `bin/server.js`, >> and the worker runs in `bin/images.js`. They don't need direct access to >> each other; they will communicate through SQS. >> >> - Image Proxy - The thing to make the public S3 bucket have saneish URLs. >> >> - Domains - The web servers should be accessible from >> profile.account.firefox.com. The images should be a different >> second-level domain. It may be that we already have a domain for this, >> since AMO and Marketplace have been serving user images for years. >> >> # ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ >> >> - Building this in stage/dev? >> I imagine stage would be like build in prod, but dev tends to use >> dannyboxes. I'm not sure we'll have access to S3 and SQS and whatnot, so I >> have been writing a `local` aws-driver, which just uses a child process and >> IPC to crunch images, and an additional route to server them from. >> >> - Testing this in stage/dev? >> With a dannybox using a `local` driver, testing on dev won't exercise the >> whole stack. I guess that's what testing in stage is for? >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev-fxacct mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct > >
_______________________________________________ Dev-fxacct mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct
