On 28/04/2016 17:13, Mark Hammond wrote:
> [...snip...]
>
> This is somewhat aspirational (ie, I'm not suggesting we would do all
> that work up-front), but there's already a bug on file to perform
> client-side schema validations for telemetry (bug 1249925) and we could
> possibly piggy-back off that work for the client side.
>
> Does anyone think this is worthwhile, or am I over-thinking the problem
> at hand and ad-hoc management of the payload definitions is OK?
I don't have a lot to add to the already great points made on the list,
but I will say: I think there's value in concretely defining the schema
*even if* we don't do all the work to validate against it. It's a great
tool for communicating clearly amongst ourselves.
I have no strong opinions on JSONSchema specifically, but I also don't
expect us to have particularly complicated needs, so we should be able
to migrate away from it if it turns out to have horrible downsides in
practice.
Cheers,
Ryan
_______________________________________________
Dev-fxacct mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct
