Wow! Can email share what changes they made to get such a big improvement? *W I L S O N P A G E*
Front-end Developer Firefox OS (Gaia) London Office Twitter: @wilsonpage IRC: wilsonpage On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Eli Perelman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello fxos, > > With deadlines for v2.5 approaching, I thought I would take a couple > minutes and summarize the current state of performance for Gaia. At the > outset of v2.5 we captured metrics of v2.2 and have used that as the > baseline to determine whether applications have regressed their performance > since. Any applications whose performance has significantly regressed since > v2.2 will need approval to not block as major increases will block v2.5. > > Enough of the chatter, here's the data: > > Calendar v2.2 cold launch: 1454ms > Calendar current cold launch: 1638ms (~180ms regression) > Calendar v2.2 USS: 14.01MB > Calendar current USS: 13.99MB (good) > > Camera v2.2 cold launch: 1492ms > Camera current cold launch: 2090ms (~600ms regression) > Camera v2.2 USS: 13.83MB > Camera current USS: 16.05MB (~2.2MB regression) > > Clock v2.2 cold launch: 1232ms > Clock current cold launch: 1260ms (acceptable) > Clock v2.2 USS: 13.98MB > Clock current USS: 14.95MB (~1MB regression) > > Contacts v2.2 cold launch: 773ms > Contacts current cold launch: 1246ms (~475ms regression) > Contacts v2.2 USS: 18.26MB > Contacts current USS: 20.04MB (~1.75MB regression) > > Dialer v2.2 cold launch: 851ms > Dialer current cold launch: 944ms (~90ms regression, still under 1000ms) > Dialer v2.2 USS: 17.48MB > Dialer current USS: 13.04MB (good!) > > Email v2.2 cold launch: 2129ms > Email current cold launch: 606ms (good!) > Email v2.2 USS: 16.17MB > Email current USS: 15.78MB (good) > > FM v2.2 cold launch: 604ms > FM current cold launch: 783ms (~175ms regression) > FM v2.2 USS: 10.37MB > FM current USS: 10.51MB (acceptable) > > Gallery v2.2 cold launch: 1113ms > Gallery current cold launch: 1207ms (~90ms regression) > Gallery v2.2 USS: 17.71MB > Gallery current USS: 18.98MB (~1.25MB regression) > > Music v2.2 cold launch: 1066ms > Music current cold launch: 1717ms (~650ms regression) > Music v2.2 USS: 13.37MB > Music current USS: 29.49MB (~16.12MB regression) > > SMS v2.2 cold launch: 1340ms > SMS current cold launch: 1630ms (~290ms regression) > SMS v2.2 USS: 12.86MB > SMS current USS: 19.94MB (~7MB regression) > > Settings v2.2 cold launch: 2474ms > Settings current cold launch: 2950ms (~475ms regression) > Settings v2.2 USS: 17.18MB > Settings current USS: 17.54MB (acceptable) > > Video v2.2 cold launch: 1115ms > Video current cold launch: 1309ms (~190ms regression) > Video v2.2 USS: 12.13MB > Video current USS: 13MB (acceptable) > > TLDR; there seem to be quite a few serious regressions across many > applications, in both cold launch time and USS memory usage. As a > comparison, the Test Startup Limit app when first captured started off in > the 880ms range, spent a good chunk of June and July around 620ms and is > now around 850ms. > > If anyone has any questions about the data or needs additional > information, please let me know. > > Also, kudos to the Email team for the massive improvement in both launch > time and memory. > > Thanks, > > Eli Perelman > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
