As for me Aries is going to move to L at some point (once Camera bugs are fixed on AOSP version) so it make sense to have emulator-x86-L to test against that version.
--- David Scravaglieri Mozilla - Firefox OS On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Ken Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > If we just want to have a later release, emulator-x86-KK has been worked > on for this. > If we would like to put the efforts on emulator porting for the newer > android version, it seem to be better to spend efforts on the latest one. > If we don't want to use the latest Android Version(M), what is different > between using KK and using L or what features force us to use L? > > Thanks, > Ken > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:16 PM, David Scravaglieri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Next step for Aries will be to move to L so yes, I think we need L port. >> >> --- >> David Scravaglieri >> Mozilla - Firefox OS >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Fabrice Desré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/06/2015 08:03 AM, Ken Chang wrote: >>> > Since Marshmellow is released today, will we still use Android L for >>> the >>> > release in May 2016? If not, it seems that we don't get any benefit on >>> > doing Emulator-x86-L for that. >>> >>> Given that we currently only run emulator tests on ICS (!!), yes running >>> emulator-L would be a big progress. And we don't even have M ports yet, >>> right? >>> >>> Fabrice >>> -- >>> Fabrice Desré >>> b2g team >>> Mozilla Corporation >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
