On 10/07/2015 03:46 PM, Fabrice Desré wrote: > Because master's quality is not where it should be. I've been using > nightlies of Firefox desktop for years and it's vastly better than > what we have on Firefox OS.
That's not an apples-to-apples comparison, since (as far as I know) developers land to mozilla-inbound, not mozilla-central. > it's ridiculous that we have a web based OS but can't update it with > a web like cadence. How does being "web based" determine release cadence? The complexity of the project seems to be a much more reliable indicator of the ideal release cadence, and I think it's safe to say that Firefox OS is more complicated than most websites. > Short term we'll set up another "no smoketest blocker" weekly > channel, but longer term we absolutely need to reach a quality level > similar to desktop. That sounds a lot like an inbound -> central model to me, so I don't see why that's not a viable long term solution too. - Jim _______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
