> I would much rather see this as an add-on. This is exactly where an add-on should not be used. The product should work as expected. In this case, all users want this functionality.
Add-ons are for when you want additional functionality that most users do not want out of the box. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM Michael Henretty <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, definitely file webcompat bugs as Karl said. > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wilson Page <[email protected]> wrote: > >> B. We follow other browser vendors' (Google and MS >> <http://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2015/06/17/building-a-more-interoperable-web-with-microsoft-edge/>) >> and alter our user agent string to prevent us being discriminated against. >> > > We actually already do this: > https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/b2g/app/ua-update.json.in > But adding to this file is a slippery slope and doesn't actually help our > platform. I would much rather see this as an add-on. > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
