I could be wrong, but do add-ons have access to wrappedJSObject? Isn’t that chrome (system principal) only? I understood that this is not available in add-ons since add-ons use the principal of the page they are injecting into (and sandboxed using cu.sandbox). Am I wrong about that? Or is this something that is explicitly made available in to add-ons?
My understanding was that the only option for intercommunication between add-on and page scripts was to use window.postMessage. Was I wrong about that? > On 9 Nov 2015, at 6:49 am, Michael Henretty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Kumar Rishav <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I meant, if i want to use some method of an object (which belong to host > app), Do i have to include that > file name (where that method resides) in the content_Script ? > > > Ah I see. No, don't do that. The script you are including and the one from > the hosted app will live in two different worlds and so won't be compatible > with each other, no the rest of the webapp. Try using wrappedJSObject. > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
