Hi On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Naoki Hirata <[email protected]> wrote:
> Specifically for the Flame device, I am currently blocked by > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1237127 in order to make > FOTA possible for Flame. The goal is to supply T2M with a FOTA build , > have the host the build and then change our FOTA servers to point to that > FOTA build for any build lower than it and then any other newer build can > be FOTA'ed by that base build. > > This is in the works. Technically T2M is hosting the build so this will > resolve any legal issues of distribution. (Process was reviewed by our > legal team and OK'ed). > what will be the gains of this update? > > Regards, > Naoki > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Le 11/01/2016 14:39, [email protected] a écrit : >> > Le lundi 11 janvier 2016 11:56:23 UTC+1, Alexandre Lissy a écrit : >> >> >> >> And if you look carefully, that is not being redistributed from >> >> Mozilla's servers, but from T2M ones. >> > >> > I didn't noticed it! Now it's clear that "not being redistributed" has >> to be understood from Mozilla's point of view, not as "not being >> redistributed at all". I didn't catch it beforehand. >> > >> >> Flashing new base system from T2M >> > >> > OK. So does it mean that Gonk upgrade can only be initiated by >> manufacturers? And then Mozilla takes on the work to adapt Gecko/Gaia code >> to the updated Gonk API, independently of the FxOS version? >> >> At some point, given this is closed source and not in the hands of >> Mozilla, I see no other way than the manufacturer/OEM doing that. >> >> > >> >>> Is mixing files coming from the same Android "version" (KK 4.4.2 in >> the present case) but not necessary the same Android "build" (KVT49L vs >> KOT49H) allowed (there's no problem with exported symbols in kernel modules >> for example)? >> > >> > So, is a locally built KOT49H kernel able to interact with KVT49L >> binary blobs/proprietary firmware provided by the manufacturer (T2M in the >> present case)? >> >> That depends on the differences ... I think there is no change to >> interfaces with minor releases so it should be okay. >> >> > >> > Thanks for the clarifications anyway. >> > >> > Émeric >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dev-fxos mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
