Yes I understand, but still it would be nice if this information would be communicated in a much better way, outside of those mailing lists, as maybe some would like a warning :)
I'll inform the Telegram people On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Naoki Hirata <nhir...@mozilla.com> wrote: > nightly-latest people will have their music app broken currently. Which > is why QA doesn't necessarily recommend nightly-latest. There's a price to > pay for being on latest... you get to see the bad issues first. ;) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Mihai Barbat <miha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> so what happens tomorrow when people will install the nightly-latest OTA? >> will it even be released in this case? >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Hubert Figuière <h...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> >>> On 28/01/16 12:10 PM, ferjmor...@gmail.com wrote: >>> > Given that FxOS 2.6 is supposed to be a "quality release" and this >>> change is most likely going to decrease quality, should we base 2.6 on >>> Gecko 45 instead of Gecko 49 as it was initially planned? >>> >>> As it is right now, Firefox OS on master is broken. >>> >>> >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197379 caused >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1243670 >>> >>> >>> Hub >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> dev-fxos@lists.mozilla.org >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> dev-fxos@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list dev-fxos@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
