Re: [oxid-dev-general] why getSelfActionLink()

[Alexander Kludt]

Would you mind providing that module for the community if this works? -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Alexander Kludt __________________________ Phone: 09283-5925453 Fax: 09283-592671 Skype: kingschnulli Email: cod...@aggrosoft.de Website: www.aggrosoft.de __________________________ Aggrosoft it intelligence GbR Tannstrasse 12 95111 Rehau GERMANY Sitz Rehau, Amtsgericht Hof Steuernummer: 223/165/54508 Ust.-Id. Nr. gemäß § 27 a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE260722773 ___________________________ Diese Nachricht ist nur für den Empfänger () bestimmt, sollten Sie nicht der Empfänger sein löschen Sie diese Nachricht umgehend und geben Sie uns bitte per Email (cod...@aggrosoft.de) Bescheid über den fälschlichen Erhalt. Joscha Krug | marmalade.de 8. Februar 2012 10:47 Hi Arvydas, thank you for your reply! As you might have seen, we developed a mobile template, based on jQuery mobile. (http://www.marmalade.de/shop/Templates/OXID-eShop-mobile-Template.html) jQuery mobile uses some fancy AJAX stuff to make the page look like an app (sliding to new pages, etc.). To detect if the page is already loaded, it checks target and actual url. So for example after adding a product to the basket you wan't be able to switch back to the start page, as the link looks the same. For that we changed those functions with a small module and everything is ok. I just wanted to ask, if there are any special things we might keep in mind. Best Joscha Arvydas Vapsva 8. Februar 2012 10:38 Hello, As you already found out all standard shop forms uses [{$oViewConf->getSelfActionLink()}] or [{ $oViewConf->getSslSelfLink() }]. It's our long time standard and it does not interfere nor with web browsers, nor with search engines, which normally does not post forms. Maybe things are different now? And can you tell me the reason why here you need SEO or why we should implement it here? Maybe you have some specific case, which could be simply solved by other solution? Regards, Arvydas -----Original Message----- From: dev-general-boun...@lists.oxidforge.org [mailto:dev-general-boun...@lists.oxidforge.org] On Behalf Of Marc Heying - Sonntagmorgen Kaffee Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:18 PM To: dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org Subject: Re: [oxid-dev-general] why getSelfActionLink() Well, right. But this could easy be implemented and is no argument for loosing the SEO-Urls here. Right? Agree! Are there any other reasons for using $oViewConf->getSelfActionLink? with kind regards Marc -- Marc Heying Coffee Geek Tel. 0251-29794-333 Fax 0251-29794-334 Sonntagmorgen GmbH Mendelstr. 11, 48149 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB 13518 Geschäftsführer: Till Achinger, Lukas Kolbe http://www.sonntagmorgen.com Am 02.02.2012 20:46, schrieb Joscha Krug | marmalade.de: Hi, Well, right. But this could easy be implemented and is no argument for loosing the SEO-Urls here. Right? Regards Joscha //--------- marmalade.de Joscha Krug www.marmalade.de <http://www.marmalade.de/> k...@marmalade.de <mailto:k...@marmalade.de> Leibnizstr.25 39104 Magdeburg GERMANY phone: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 104 fax: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 106 Am 02.02.2012 16:18, schrieb Marc Heying - Sonntagmorgen Kaffee: Hi Joscha, doesn' t $oViewConf->getSelfActionLink() return an https url when activated? I'm not shure wether it's useful to return an ssl product link when you're not in the checkout, but i'm shure somebody who is curius about ssl protected shopping loves this feature. Regards Marc 2012/2/2 Joscha Krug | marmalade.de <k...@marmalade.de>: Hi all, during the latest work on our mobile template, we stumbled upon the action-link for the tobasket function / form. Why does OXID use [{$oViewConf->getSelfActionLink()} instead of [{$oDetailsProduct->getLink()}] on the detailspage. Did we miss something? It seems like it works perfect in our test environement. Regards Joscha //--------- marmalade.de Joscha Krug www.marmalade.de k...@marmalade.de Leibnizstr.25 39104 Magdeburg GERMANY phone: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 104 fax: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 106 _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general Marc Heying - Sonntagmorgen Kaffee 7. Februar 2012 16:17 Well, right. But this could easy be implemented and is no argument for loosing the SEO-Urls here. Right? Agree! Are there any other reasons for using $oViewConf->getSelfActionLink? with kind regards Marc -- Marc Heying Coffee Geek Tel. 0251-29794-333 Fax 0251-29794-334 Sonntagmorgen GmbH Mendelstr. 11, 48149 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB 13518 Geschäftsführer: Till Achinger, Lukas Kolbe http://www.sonntagmorgen.com Am 02.02.2012 20:46, schrieb Joscha Krug | marmalade.de: Hi, Well, right. But this could easy be implemented and is no argument for loosing the SEO-Urls here. Right? Regards Joscha //--------- marmalade.de Joscha Krug www.marmalade.de <http://www.marmalade.de/> k...@marmalade.de <mailto:k...@marmalade.de> Leibnizstr.25 39104 Magdeburg GERMANY phone: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 104 fax: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 106 Am 02.02.2012 16:18, schrieb Marc Heying - Sonntagmorgen Kaffee: Hi Joscha, doesn' t $oViewConf->getSelfActionLink() return an https url when activated? I'm not shure wether it's useful to return an ssl product link when you're not in the checkout, but i'm shure somebody who is curius about ssl protected shopping loves this feature. Regards Marc 2012/2/2 Joscha Krug | marmalade.de <k...@marmalade.de>: Hi all, during the latest work on our mobile template, we stumbled upon the action-link for the tobasket function / form. Why does OXID use [{$oViewConf->getSelfActionLink()} instead of [{$oDetailsProduct->getLink()}] on the detailspage. Did we miss something? It seems like it works perfect in our test environement. Regards Joscha //--------- marmalade.de Joscha Krug www.marmalade.de k...@marmalade.de Leibnizstr.25 39104 Magdeburg GERMANY phone: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 104 fax: +49 (0) 391 / 559 22 106 _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general Joscha Krug | marmalade.de 2. Februar 2012 20:46 Hi, Well, right. But this could easy be implemented and is no argument for loosing the SEO-Urls here. Right? Regards Joscha _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general Joscha Krug | marmalade.de 2. Februar 2012 15:58 Hi all, during the latest work on our mobile template, we stumbled upon the action-link for the tobasket function / form. Why does OXID use  [{$oViewConf->getSelfActionLink()} instead of [{$oDetailsProduct->getLink()}] on the detailspage. Did we miss something? It seems like it works perfect in our test environement. Regards Joscha _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general

_______________________________________________
dev-general mailing list
dev-general@lists.oxidforge.org
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general