Hi List / OXID I would appreciate any possibility to have a simple workflow like suggested from Dave! While having an intense talk with Caroline and Roland at the unconference in May, not taking advantage of the huge knowledge and work of the community was one of the major points of critique mentioned by me. I think this would offer a great opportunity to engage the community and gain a mutual benefit while pushing forward OXID eShop!
Ray (..onwards conquering the world!) -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Marco Steinhaeuser Gesendet: Montag, 16. Juli 2012 17:51 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [oxid-dev-general] OXID-CE and the 'community'. Hi, > @Marco what do you think? Have there been any further developments on this? Absolutely mate! Me and Dainius put our heads together when I was in Lithuania a couple of weeks ago. The point is: there's still some stuff to do with the deployer script as well as we have in mind to re-arrange the branches. So I doubt it will have been done before the 5.0 release but it will definitely happen. In the mean time - you have signed an OCA, right? - just send me unified diffs by email or add them as a comment to the bug reports. It is always appreciated. Looking forward to it :-) Marco ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Dave J. Holloway [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 5:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [oxid-dev-general] OXID-CE and the 'community'. Hi Adrian, Thanks for the answer. Your link didn't work, but I found it here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general/1697 Here's the excerpt: > Hello Adrian, > > do you know the word "You can't catch two birds with one stone"? :-)) > > Basically, OXID projects is a totally different topic to moving the core to > GitHub. Anyway, we already have that in our back heads. Maybe a good first > step would be to use GitHub as a mirror instead of the public SVN where we > mirror the development SVN now on a nightly basis: > http://svn.oxid-esales.com/ > > But also this step needs evaluation, thinking about the processes and some > effort within the infrastructure. That's why I can't promise any time frame > for that. > > Thanks for your idea anyway :-) > > Marco What a shame. I think OXID are missing out on a lot of 'free development' from the community. It doesn't even need to be GitHub. A standalone git server (just git, not github) over HTTP would do just fine. I assume that would get around any licensing issues. They could use public branches for CE and private clones for PE/EE. @Marco what do you think? Have there been any further developments on this? Dave Am 16.07.12 16:56, schrieb Adrian Kirchner: > Hi Dave, > > I asked for Github migration in april this year and I think Marcos > answer is still the last official answer to this topic: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01602.h > tml > > > > Best regards > > Adrian > _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list [email protected] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list [email protected] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list [email protected] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
