Le mer 02/12/09 21:32, "Madeleine Price Ball" [email protected] a écrit: > > We think that the specific knowledge of the > publishers should be how to > select the content - which content goes where in > which form - and not > technical questions such as compression, storage or > retrieving the data on > the user's end. > > OK, if I shouldn't be talking to you guys, tell me who to talk to. > > Yes, selecting content is very difficult. I couldn't get Peru or SJ to > contribute meaningfully to generating a simple blacklist of articles > that should NOT be included on the OLPC activity. (Recall it is being > given to young children!) I ended up making the blacklist myself based > on my own gut feelings. If Peru's board of education or OLPC's > "director of content" couldn't get their act together for this simple > task, expecting others to do this task for you will be a huge > roadblock to getting content out. > > Traffic based content is simple and effective and it doesn't involve a > lot of opinions on what should or should not be included.
Yes, compiling such stats with incoming link counter & interwiki counter, it is possible to get a pretty accurate and "neutral" selection quickly for any Wikipedia. I have scripts to do that automaticaly: http://kiwix.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/kiwix/selection_tools/ Emmanuel _______________________________________________ dev-l mailing list [email protected] https://intern.openzim.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-l
