On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:10:01 +0200, Manuel Schneider wrote:
Title or Source could help here maybe.
My opinion:
* "Title" is a label, we should not base such a automatic mechanism on
that.
* "Source" could be better but I have a bad feeling. Currently nobody
use it, this is not clear for me what should exactly be there (if you
have for example a ZIM with WP and WS). We also though about it to be
able to provide dynamically generated "go to online version" buttons on
articles. Worth, I see now way to guaranty the uniqueness of this value
over the different publishers.
If we really need a new entity I would prefer if it was also defined
by
Dublin Core.
http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
Identifiere looks useful.
Why not? But "identifier" looks like our ZIM id. It does not seems to
have something about "serie" or "collection".
On the other hand I think the information could be retrieved from
combined metadata to keep it simpler and easier to understand (human
readable):
Like Subject = Wikipedia and Language = en, plus Date should give
everything we need.
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
dev-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://intern.openzim.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-l
