Of course. Just wanted to make sure what is happening. And I don't
share the view that there is something new in SCM every other month.
It has been CVS about 10 years ago, SVN about 5 years ago, and it is
GIT now. You have to be aware of these developments. Even if it is
just to understand why we don't follow the latest trend ;-)
- B
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Grégory Joseph wrote:
+1. Git and many others all have their valid point but
- none is mainstream enough (we're already striving for getting
people to participate in Magnolia, there are enough (ie too many)
entry barriers as it stands)
- subversion is still evolving and the latest version (1.5)
addresses some of the branching issues - it'd probably be a better
(and smaller) investment to see if that would bring us any benefit.
- there's a new-hot-thing in scm every other month, so i'd rather
wait and see what happens until we actually have a real issue with
svn (to Boris: yeah, the issue I had yesterday --- my local copy was
corrupted, that's all :p)
-g
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Philipp Bracher wrote:
Looks tempting. Having temporal branches outside the main
repository has definitely its point. The obstacle I can see is all
the effort which would have to be done. And therefore I am not sure
if it paid off.
- jira integration
- IDE integration (collaborate with maven plugins)
- migration of current svn content
- ..
Since I don't feel as if I miss something in subversion today I
don't like to move in the next months.
Philipp Bracher
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
