[
http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MAGNOLIA-3080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=26578#action_26578
]
Grégory Joseph commented on MAGNOLIA-3080:
------------------------------------------
If anything, we could now merge these two classes (thus FreemarkerHelper would
become observed)
* (+) it would probably eliminate the need to subclass
{{freemarker.template.Configuration}} and the need for the
{{ConfigDelegating*}} inner classes
* (-) it might create unnecessary clutter in its interface
> Cleanup conundrum between FreemarkerHelp and FreemarkerConfig
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAGNOLIA-3080
> URL: http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MAGNOLIA-3080
> Project: Magnolia
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core, freemarker
> Reporter: Grégory Joseph
> Assignee: Grégory Joseph
> Fix For: 4.3
>
>
> Now that {{Components}} returns proxies for observed objects, and that
> {{ObservedComponentFactory}} is able to return a default implementation for
> non-existing nodes (at least for concrete classes), we can finally cleanup
> the mess between those 2 components.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------
