[
http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MAGNOLIA-3172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Haderka updated MAGNOLIA-3172:
----------------------------------
Description:
just to summarize discussion from #modeshape:
- structure of {{magnolia-nodetypes.xml}} is JR specific and not JCR compliant.
There are few things that need to be fixed such as according to JCR multivalue
properties such supertypes should be encoded in single value or can be ignored
by repo (which is what MS does). (see JCR 1.0.1 6.4.2.5/Export)
- CND notation is supported by both JR and MS and doesn't suffer from such issue
- Our node type structure also exposed some bugs in MS, so their dev team
converted our definition in CND
(http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-type-notation.html) notation supported by
both JR and MS and included it in their test cases
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/modeshape/trunk/modeshape-jcr/src/test/resources/magnolia.cnd
... since the CND is more readable then xml I would be in favor to abandon the
xml and use CND from now on.
Reference to the spec for CND:
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html (section 3.7.9)
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/25_Appendix.html
was:
just to summarize discussion from #modeshape:
- structure of {{magnolia-nodetypes.xml}} is JR specific and not JCR compliant.
There are few things that need to be fixed such as according to JCR multivalue
properties such supertypes should be encoded in single value or can be ignored
by repo (which is what MS does). (see JCR 1.0.1 6.4.2.5/Export)
- CND notation is supported by both JR and MS and doesn't suffer from such issue
- Our node type structure also exposed some bugs in MS, so their dev team
converted our definition in CND
(http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-type-notation.html) notation supported by
both JR and MS and included it in their test cases
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/modeshape/trunk/modeshape-jcr/src/test/resources/magnolia.cnd
... since the CND is more readable then xml I would be in favor to abandon the
xml and use CND from now on.
> Change node type definition from XML to CND
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAGNOLIA-3172
> URL: http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MAGNOLIA-3172
> Project: Magnolia
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1
> Reporter: Jan Haderka
> Assignee: Philipp Bärfuss
> Fix For: 4.3.x
>
>
> just to summarize discussion from #modeshape:
> - structure of {{magnolia-nodetypes.xml}} is JR specific and not JCR
> compliant. There are few things that need to be fixed such as according to
> JCR multivalue properties such supertypes should be encoded in single value
> or can be ignored by repo (which is what MS does). (see JCR 1.0.1
> 6.4.2.5/Export)
> - CND notation is supported by both JR and MS and doesn't suffer from such
> issue
> - Our node type structure also exposed some bugs in MS, so their dev team
> converted our definition in CND
> (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-type-notation.html) notation supported by
> both JR and MS and included it in their test cases
> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/modeshape/trunk/modeshape-jcr/src/test/resources/magnolia.cnd
>
> ... since the CND is more readable then xml I would be in favor to abandon
> the xml and use CND from now on.
> Reference to the spec for CND:
> http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html (section 3.7.9)
> http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/25_Appendix.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.magnolia-cms.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details see
http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------
