On 23.06.2010, at 13:45, Grégory Joseph wrote: > On Jun 20, 2010, at 9:03, Will Scheidegger wrote: > >> [...] I was not aware of the fact that including scripts in the head section >> would be treated differently by clients / spam filters than simply linking >> to scripts. > > Either way, most clients will (rightfully) ignore the javascript in email > bodies; especially webmail clients. What kind of JS did you want to include > in a mail ?
Ah, o.k., then it might be a good idea to remove scripts in the first place. I was not planing on including a specific script. I was just doing a test sending a magnolia page which had a JS for some UI features which of course would not work any longer in the mail client. > If we're serious about sending more than 2 emails at a time from Magnolia, we > need some form of queue mechanism, where mails are temporarily queued before > being sent - allows for "batches" - and where they go back in case of errors > - keeps on sending the next emails when one fails, and allows to re-send or > discard the failed ones. Yes, that's pretty much what I intended to do with the "serial mail configuration": - number of mails to be sent before reconnecting to the server - interval between connections -will ---------------------------------------------------------------- For list details see http://www.magnolia-cms.com/home/community/mailing-lists.html To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------------
