On 9/22/06, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/21/06, Sameer Charles (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Persisting Map in workitem creates additional objects
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAGNOLIA-1072
> URL: http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-1072
> Project: magnolia
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: workflow
> Affects Versions: 3.0 RC2
> Reporter: Sameer Charles
> Assigned To: John Mettraux
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0 RC3
>
>
> To Reproduce:
>
> - Create a Map with 3 entries "A" "B" "C"
> - Add this in to a workitem which persists it
> - get this workitem back and dump this Map
> - you will get somethng like "A" "B" "class" "C"
Hi Sameer,
I've had a look at this issue.
The 'elegant way' to solve that problem would be by using a namespace
like "owfe" or "wf" for the workflow.
The modification would occur (first step) into that piece of code :
http://svn.magnolia.info/view/magnolia/trunk/magnolia-module-workflow/src/main/java/info/magnolia/module/workflow/jcr/JCRWorkItemAPI.java?rev=6409&view=markup
I'm just wondering if Mangoldia... Err, no, ;-) Magnolia would allow
such namespaces.
WDYT ?
Could I could for a constant namespace like :
public final static String WORKFLOW_BEANCODER_NS = "wf";
with WorkflowConstants.java ?
Hi Sameer,
actually, I took another path (no namespace required). It's checked in
within OpenWFE 1.7.2pre11 (currently being uploaded to
http://maven.openwfe.org/prereleases for Philipp).
Please give me feedback on how well it works for you.
Best regards,
--
John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
