We're doing our best not to outright CHANGE our protocol - just add and
enhance what's already there.
We work hard to maintain backwards compatability with our client code base
and the technologies they represend.
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Support Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Noah Couture wrote:
> Sort of.
>
> We ended up writing a little inetd daemon in perl that talks to opensrs with the
>standard .pm. The java runtime opens a socket and chats with it. It works fine, but
>I suppose its a bit slow.
>
> Previous to settling on that solution, I found the C library that someone had
>submitted and wrote a JNI interface to it. It worked, but we worried that the
>opensrs people might change the protocol and our code would break. With the perl
>server solution, we don't have to worry about that. Also the EJB spec forbids JNI,
>so that was a problem too.
>
> Of course, a Java version that does the actual socket and encryption work would be
>great. If anyone has started on this, I'd love to hear about it.
>
> p.s. Your digitial id thing is kind of annoying on a public list.
>
> --noah
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vince Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 2:02 PM
> Subject: Java Developement
>
>
> > Has anyone done any Java Servlet or JSP porting of the opensrs software?
> >
>
