Humm... I just reg'd a new one using my existing profile and indeed, now
get_domains returns both of those. But the odd thing is, when I created the
profile, I registered both the .com and .net versions of the domain, so I
would have thought both would be in the same profile...

I just retried this and same results. Is this a bug? Here's exactly what I
did: 
1. reg_system.cgi, searched for applepie.com
2. Clicked off the .net version on the results page (so I registered both
.com and .net versions), then registered them under a new account.
3. Completed the order, went to Resellers-test and approved them, then did a
get_domain using the new account credentials and applepie.com. All it
returns is that domain.

Is this expected behavior or just a buglet?

 -wayne

on 8/15/00 10:50, Charles Daminato at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> You have to have more than one domain in a profile to get this feature to
> list the domains.  Also, since we page the domains (in manage.cgi) by 50
> per page, you can pick a specific page by using it's number.
> 
> wkw wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Just getting started with the OpenSRS client, and I have to build some
>> specialized wrappers to the client library. So I've been stepping through
>> each of the documented client API calls, and I'm a bit stumped on the
>> get_domains call.
>> 
>> Here's the template:
>> 
>> get_domains
>> cookie *
>> page (integer of which page of domains to retrieve)
>> 
>> My guess is this provides a way for a customer to view a list of all their
>> domains; or in other words, all those registered under the same
>> (username/passwd) profile. But anytime I send the required
>> cookie-alternative fields (reg_username, reg_password, domain), I get back
>> only the domain that I sent, and  not the others I've registered with the
>> same profile within the Resellers-Test environement.
>> 
>> Searching the dev list archives brought up no hits, and quick scans of the
>> monthly archives produced no answer either.
>> 
>> Can someone in the know elaborate on this function a bit for me?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> -wayne

Reply via email to