It *should* work out of the box...

There's a config in XML_Client.pm - you have to tell it the location of
your OpenSRS.conf file.  I'm not sure why the programmers did this, but
that'll fix your error.

I didn't have to move OPS.pm into the lib directory... (or maybe I did?)
I'll have to check my setup.

Thanks for the feedback, and goodluck!

Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Support Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:

> Has anyone been able to get the 2.2 code working as shipped?
> 
> After installing, verify_install.cgi (and manage.cgi) gives:
> 
> Can't locate OPS.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/lib 
>/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 
>/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd 
>/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 .) at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/lib/OpenSRS/XML_Client.pm line 44.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/lib/OpenSRS/XML_Client.pm line 44.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/cgi-bin/secure/verify_install.cgi line 36.
> [Tue Sep  5 22:36:20 2000] [error] [client 209.220.147.181] Premature end of script 
>headers: /usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/cgi-bin/secure/verify_install.cgi
> 
> So I symlink lib/OpenSRS/{OPS,XML_CODEM}.pm to lib/ so it can find those
> files.  Alternatively, I could have added lib/OpenSRS to the search path.
> 
> However, it still fails:
> 
> Global symbol "$OPENSRS_TLDS_REGEX" requires explicit package name at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/lib/OpenSRS/XML_Client.pm line 558.
> Compilation failed in require at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/cgi-bin/secure/verify_install.cgi line 36.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
>/usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/cgi-bin/secure/verify_install.cgi line 36.
> [Tue Sep  5 22:36:52 2000] [error] [client 209.220.147.181] Premature end of script 
>headers: /usr/local/www/test.retsiger.com/cgi-bin/secure/verify_install.cgi
> 
> I would have assumed the code would work "as is" out of the box but I guess
> not.  Is it just me?
> 

Reply via email to