-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
What's the point of having 2 nameds vs 1 named. I dont see why running
1 named is not enough.
Cheers
Paul
******************************************************************************
PGP Key:
Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
pub 2048/D467B527 1999/04/12 Paul Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 33 92 6A 87 23 81 3F 44 5A 7D F3 8F 03 CE 2D 60
Public key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD467B527
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Sergei Kolodka wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Need smart advice. I'm trying to set two binds
> at one host with ip aliasing. Just to register
> both in Registry database.
> I think that run two copies of bind with their own named.conf
> it's easiest way, but have some questions.
> Note, .246 it's normal ip, .244 - aliased.
>
> /etc/named.conf
> options {
> directory "/var/named";
> listen-on { 213.35.173.246; 127.0.0.1; };
> pid-file "named.pid";
> };
> ...
>
> /etc/named1.conf
> options {
> directory "/var/named";
> listen-on { 213.35.173.244; };
> pid-file "named1.pid";
> };
> ...
>
> It seems like it work.
> Any problems with this configuration ?
> Or maybe some tips how to do that better ?
> If someone used this before, i'm interested in your experience.
>
> Regards
> Sergei Kolodka
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Public key ID: 0xD467B527
iQEVAwUBOfmpHVj6i6zUZ7UnAQETnwf+IjqtfkZFmhMUPsPH3K3D1gP2/qdvcQ6z
dsFVQ4UkYlodJrfZKsiAQSA5nnn2m1WrQK8egn3GZFxiiT0G9KDC4XQaKbZcD21h
vgrot7f8koukLG85zcKroFqodnYCP8ABeKZSlHhIDC3U3jYSSO/gc3oZ8wZg4i4r
mW2X25Yi+MTGk0pdQfoGiVYUurxKMgxjPV7bU2iAE9q14dUKp1XYppuK5Z7Y0iFP
I1zN8mq1amVpy/DTpk+WHNiMZGfOckoxvfbwMGyrMaSHjGTXRh8i63NmEv3Ef/TX
hPzXYbcmrihz8ZsTEVEFdkjJ6OB1aO4durCq8TQPwAX3WL0RLveXcw==
=fKPc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
