On So, 28 Dez 2008, وفا خلیقی، Vafa Khalighi wrote: > If you think that the current bidirectional algorithm of LuaTeX is just fine, > then this will be my last email.
It seems that you are not open for discussion. Taco, Hans, et al have asked you for explanations why you believe your approach is better, but you missed to provide facts. That is life, those who are doing the programming work have the rights to make decisions, and without good arguments from other sides they will do what they think best. And since there are quite a lot working with Arabic texts here on the list and it seems nobody chimed in with you, it seems that you are having an even smaller ground. Anyway, if you come back with good arguments I am sure Taco and Hans and Idris and whoever will take it up. Enjoy Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <[email protected]> Vienna University of Technology Debian Developer <[email protected]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCRONKEY (n.) Something that hits the window as a result of a violent sneeze. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
