On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:03:19PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
>> [un-cc-ing the metapost list since this part is only about luatex]
>>
>> Khaled Hosny a écrit :
>>> OK, here is a more or less working man page, based on pdftex.man and
>>> luatex.1 from Debian.
>>
>> Cool, thanks!
>
> Very cool. I don't know how to edit it, but I can give comments
> and other help, if you don't mind.
>
> * --lua is actually optional even though it looks to be required
>   now from the SYNOPSIS (I am sorry, I know this came from the
>   commandline help, but that is also a bit misleading)

It is now surrounded by square brackets.

>   The option list is a bit outdated in any case, I will try to
>   document the actual, complete option list tomorrow.

That would be very helpful, since I'd to guess most of the time.

> * It would be nice if some one-liner about Unicode and OpenType
>   fonts could be squeezed in.

Added sort of.

>
> * Maybe point to either www.luatex.org or to "texdoc luatex"
>   (although I am not certain that that actually works)

I pointed to both :)

>
>>> I omitted some options from pdftex man page that
>>> I'm not sure are supported by luatex, included some descriptions from
>>> luatex manual, and some formatting. The ENVIRONMENT section is a direct
>>> copy from pdftex man page, not sure if there is some thing that need to
>>> be added/removed for luatex. FILES, AVAILABILITY and BUGS sections were
>>> omitted as well.
>>>
>> Maybe TEXPOOL isn't relevant any more (not sure).
>
> The env variables are all sort of weird:

I commented it all out, should we remove it altogether?

Regards,
 Khaled


-- 
 Khaled Hosny
 Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
 Free font developer

Attachment: luatex.man
Description: Unix manual page

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex

Reply via email to