Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Though large operator super/subscript are better now, I think it is
still broken. Compare the attached office2007 and luatex generated PDFs.
if you look in the font you will notice that the cambria integral
signs have a wrong boundingbox (too much white at the right); as it
happens, compensating with the italic correction sort of solves this
so we guess that word is doing something like that
I tried to follow the spec, and the result was pretty broken (the sup
and superscripts came effectively behind the operator), so office is
expecting Cambria's behaviour from all fonts, so I can't see why new
fonts will not do the same.
so why only integral and not all characters? what is ms's (otf math)
definition of italic correction then?
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
