On 22 December 2009 Hartmut Henkel wrote: > seems to be a 32/64 bit issue. After sprinkling the md5.c code with 32 > bit MASKs (see diff) luatex indeed gives the correct > 098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6 on an x86_64 AMD debian Linux PC.
Many thanks to everybody who helped to find the bug, and to Hartmut, who provided a fix. Hartmut, did you consider already to inform the Lua developers. I think that this problem should be fixed upstream. I surmise that Lua is supposed to work on 16 bit systems as well, hence I suppose that the code has to be revised anyway. Regards, Reinhard -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 Marschnerstr. 25 D-30167 Hannover mailto:[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
