On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > > > > from my point of view Cweb/Noweb generate C code (as do flex and > > bison), whereas Doxygen uses (annotated) C code to generate > > documentation. Thus they fall into quite different categories.
yes, and i guess one key difference is that in *web you can use named chunks _before_ having defined their contents. One can't do this with "normal" macro languages or Doxygen, so *web add a level of shuffleability. > On that note (and lacking other discussion input), I move we go with > Cweb. happy with it. Regards, Hartmut _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
