2010/11/29 Khaled Hosny <[email protected]>: > I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex, > omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it > be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them? > > pdftexversion > pdftexrevision > > OmegaVersion > > AlephVersion > Alephminorversion > Alephrevision > Alephversion > Omegaminorversion > Omegarevision > Omegaversion > > eTeXVersion > eTeXminorversion > eTeXrevision > eTeXversion
Macros that use these primitives (e.g. pdftex.def) will still work. Best Martin _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
