On 10/1/2013 11:26 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/1/2013 11:19 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 10/01/2013 11:11 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
as long as we keep the (unique) date in the luatex banner ... context
uses that for automatically regenerating the format etc and that's a
feature I'd not like to see go awa
Does it matter to you whether it is an actual date string, or could it
be a subversion revision number? (both are possible, the date string
would simply switch to the datetime associated with the subversion
revision instead of the actual build date).
(to be clear: i don't use the primitive, just the banner, so the
primitive can go anyway)
we could have
luatex 0.77.0 (rev xxxx) (date ....)
(beta- prefix not needed)
and any piece of the workflow could ignore whatever bit they like and/or
the date part could be omitted for stable releases
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
