Again I don't understand exactly what you mean here, but it's important to have tests that are invalid according to the syntax rules of section 3.1; we need to verify that non-conforming WebVTT files are parsed correctly according to the rules of sections 3.2 and 3.3. We know from bitter experience that authors will create non-conforming content and need to get consistent results across browsers for such content :-).
Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28] _______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
