On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Chris Double <[email protected]>wrote:

> I think we should support the VP9 video code. It has recently been
> added to Chromium [1]. According to the media it will be rolled out to
> YouTube. It's added to WebM [2].
>

I think we should support it. However, there's a question of whether we
should push Google to mint a "WebM2" format instead of shoving the new
codecs into WebM. We had an agreed goal for WebM to be a fixed set of
codecs, to avoid the sort of confusion we have over what support for 3GP or
MP4 means ... it's disappointing to break that at (nearly) the first
opportunity.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm
aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt
wyeonut thoo mken.o w
_______________________________________________
dev-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media

Reply via email to