My use case is client-server group conferencing, not p2p. Everyone has already logged into a particular room, and per-group passwords are used for ICE. The fact that a client has a valid ice-ufrag and the group password means that they have already been authorized. I could modify the system for separate ice passwords, but it would not improve security, and would add complexity.
This same issue came up on discuss-webrtc a while back. Where once Chrome did not allow changing ice-ufrag and ice-pwd, eventually they decided to allow it, and it has been so for many releases now. On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:49:58 AM UTC-7, Adam Roach wrote: > On 6/26/13 11:39, bryandonnovan wrote: > > > Is it possible to modify the ice-ufrag and ice-pwd in the SDP returned by > > createAnswer? > > > > > > It has no effect when I modify the SDP before calling setLocalDescription. > > > > > > Is this a known issue? Should I file a bug? > > > > See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784514 > > > > However, note that the W3C has not yet determined what parts of SDP the > > scripts are allowed to edit, and which parts are immutable. If we had > > the conversation today, I'm pretty sure the ufrag and password would not > > be considered candidates for editing. > > > > To put a finer point on it: I'm probably the one who will be > > implementing the SDP editing handling, and I did not plan on allowing > > these values to be changed. Can you explain why you would want to do this? > > > > -- > > Adam Roach > > Principal Platform Engineer > > [email protected] > > +1 650 903 0800 x863 _______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
