On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:00:58 PM UTC+8, Thinker K.F. Li wrote: > I had learnt from 883749 that still qwe are working on Vorbis. I don't > get the point why we insist to implement VP8+Vorbis when we are going to > implement VP9? Even VP9 is slow now for B2G; but it would be improved > expected, and already we are working on h.264+aac solution, it don't > hurt B2G with slow VP9 for temporary. It's not relative to B2G. On B2G, we will use platform default encoder in StageFright. > > We support VP9/VP8 for providing and promoting a loyalty free solution. > Since VP9 is our long term solution for loyalty free, not VP8, I don't > think we need to work on VP8+Vorbis that would be dropped certainly > later. That's make sense to me. > > -- > > Sinker > > -- > > 天教懶漫帶疏狂
_______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
