On 13-09-04 1:15 AM, Randy Lin wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am working on video recording container stuff.
> Right now we have the vp8/vp9 video encoder and opus audio encoder, 

Do we have vp9? I thought the libvpx in m-c only did vp8.

> But the opus in WebM 2.0 spec seems have not defined well already.

I'm not happy with the state of the spec, but it is ready for
implementation feedback. It would be valuable to have experience with
the issues there before WebM 2 gets too far along in other implementations.


> If we use the WebM 1.0, we may need to implement vorbis and mux the 
> vp8+vobris in WebM 1.0.

Yes, we'd need to enable the vorbis encoder and add muxing support for
vp8+vorbis.

My instinct would be to do WebM 1 first, as it's lower risk. Software
VP8 encoding uses less cpu and hardware support is better deployed.
However it's a shame to not use the Opus encoder we've already
implemented, and I intend to have vp9 playback support working for ff28.

I'd say it depends on how much do you want to work on the experimental
Opus muxing.

 -r

_______________________________________________
dev-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media

Reply via email to