On 21/02/2014 05:47, Dan Mosedale wrote: > I talked to Adam a bit about the security context today, and he > suggested assuming for now that we're likely to get good enough > security code partitioning that we'll have the option of moving > forward with Backbone or something like it if that makes sense. > > My understanding (which may or may not be correct), is that there is > no particular framework for B2G apps generally, and that each one does > its own thing. Something I was told by someone at the Summit was that on Mobile using frameworks and libraries is painful performance-wise, and they had spent a lot of time taking libraries out and making everything as minimal as possible. The basic summary was that mobile performance was bad and using libraries generally made it worse.
I can't remember who it was, but this might be worth taking into consideration here (and it may be why B2G apps have rolled their own specific frameworks/needs). Mark.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
