On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Justin Lebar <justin.le...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we have a preference between using explicitly-sized arguments (e.g. > PRInt32) and implicitly-sized arguments (e.g. long) in XPIDL?
Is it really implicitly-sized? It's actually defined as PRInt32 by XPIDL. I agree that it sucks as a type name, but a lot of things suck about XPIDL. Are you just stating that it sucks as a type name because it's not clear? -Ted _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
