On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:52:23 +0100, Anthony Ricaud wrote: > On 18/03/13 17:39, L. David Baron wrote: >> On Monday 2013-03-18 09:27 -0700, Jason Smith wrote: >> I'd actually like to see Core higher on the list for the >> no-canconfirm case. I think it's common for reasonably >> well-informed Web developers (who would have been able to choose a >> reasonably correct component within Core, given the list) to file >> standards bugs and end up with them languishing in Firefox::General. >> And I think appropriate guiding for Web developers filing bugs >> against the rendering engine is an important case. > > I'd suggest renaming Core here. Web developers don't understand what > Core is. They might know Gecko though. Does it make sense to rename Core > to Gecko?
I'm sure web developers have heard of Gecko (Webkit, Trident, etc) but do they know what Gecko actually covers? Changing Core to Gecko just changes one funny code word with another funny code word. Phil -- Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.c...@gmail.com> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
